Portada
mis comunidades
otras secciones
#11:
#9 Esto he encontrado en Reddit.
Clickbait title is clickbait.
The suits are more a discovery type item, not actually suing anybody in a punitive way.
In Hawaii, the natives are allowed to live on any land they hold, including access, regardless of who or what surrounds that land. People might have a piece of land on a farm, and that piece gets to have a safe right of way pathway road built to it if the Hawaiian person decides to have it. Or they can dispose of it to the person who otherwise surrounds their land. This is the law.
What Zuck is doing is attempting to root out the unused plots inside the land he owns so that he can buy them away. This requires filing... aka a 'suit'... to do so properly.
It's not like he's throwing people off their own land. It's more like "Hey... anyone using this? No? Ok, I claim domain. Oh, wait, you do? You using it? How much you want for it? Ok, cool, thanks, here's your money."
They are under NO obligation to sell. But they do have to be found and dealt with. And I'll be honest and admit that there will be some kind of gentle pressure to just sell it rather than keep it... 'gentle' being a nice way to put it.
Nonetheless, this article paints a negative light on what's going on, and if I were his lawyers, I would be having a couple of words with them about it... and how much it's going to cost them for doing it. But that's just me. He probably won't do anything about it, 'cause what's the point, after all. He's already pretty non-liked, seems, so what's another thing?
Clickbait title is clickbait.
The suits are more a discovery type item, not actually suing anybody in a punitive way.
In Hawaii, the natives are allowed to live on any land they hold, including access, regardless of who or what surrounds that land. People might have a piece of land on a farm, and that piece gets to have a safe right of way pathway road built to it if the Hawaiian person decides to have it. Or they can dispose of it to the person who otherwise surrounds their land. This is the law.
What Zuck is doing is attempting to root out the unused plots inside the land he owns so that he can buy them away. This requires filing... aka a 'suit'... to do so properly.
It's not like he's throwing people off their own land. It's more like "Hey... anyone using this? No? Ok, I claim domain. Oh, wait, you do? You using it? How much you want for it? Ok, cool, thanks, here's your money."
They are under NO obligation to sell. But they do have to be found and dealt with. And I'll be honest and admit that there will be some kind of gentle pressure to just sell it rather than keep it... 'gentle' being a nice way to put it.
Nonetheless, this article paints a negative light on what's going on, and if I were his lawyers, I would be having a couple of words with them about it... and how much it's going to cost them for doing it. But that's just me. He probably won't do anything about it, 'cause what's the point, after all. He's already pretty non-liked, seems, so what's another thing?
#14:
"Publicado el 2 mar. 2017"
Y ya dice Zuckerberg demandó en pasado.
La demanda fue retirada en enero de este año: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38780822
Vamos. Que antigua y si existiera el voto seria desactualizada.
Y ya dice Zuckerberg demandó en pasado.
La demanda fue retirada en enero de este año: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38780822
Vamos. Que antigua y si existiera el voto seria desactualizada.
Comentarios
¿Es obligatorio ser gilipollas para ser multimillonario?
#1 Hombre, el chaval cara de gilipollas tiene.
Pero esa cara ya la tenía antes de ser millonario.
#2 Es la típica cara de gilipollas de millonario.
Si vienes con eso de serie, tienes ya medio camino recorrido.
#1 #2 Ahora reflexionemos sobre la cantidad de información que tiene ese tío sobre todas las personas del mundo. Ese tío es tal vez más poderoso que Trump.
#1 No, eso sólo es si conduces un BMW
#1, o a lo mejor es que ser multimillonario te hace gilipollas....o quizás tenga que ver con la religión de este chaval, donde la usura está bien Vista.
"Publicado el 2 mar. 2017"
Y ya dice Zuckerberg demandó en pasado.
La demanda fue retirada en enero de este año: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38780822
Vamos. Que antigua y si existiera el voto seria desactualizada.
Errónea. Las demandas se retiraron en enero.
http://www.t13.cl/noticia/mundo/mark-zuckerberg-retira-polemicas-demandas-vecinos-hawai-hacerse-tierras
#14 Ahora te leo.
#14 Es el nivelazo que hay en meneame ultimamente.
700 acres = 2,832,799 metros cuadrados
#5 Y me alegra que usen campos de fútbol (americano, supongo) para medir: 500 de ellos caben ahí.
Ah, por cierto, la granja costó 1 Cristiano Ronaldo
#5 283 hectáreas creo, porque ahí sólo veo tres números distintos separados por comas
#8 280 aprox. Divide para 10.000 no seas vago.
Que no es tanto la verdad. Bueno si lo usas para cultivar cebada te da para vivir. Si lo quieres como jardín... Necesitas una cosechadora para cortar el césped
#16 Algo asi, o que algunos tienen parcelas dentro (o rodeadas) de su terreno y para encontrar quienes son debe poner una denuncia y luego les hace una oferta.
Según la imagen es un Mark Zuckerberg de proporciones monstruosas, solo una cabeza quizás.
Estoy en el trabajo y no puedo ver el vídeo. ¿Alguien puede aclarar qué pasa? Entiendo que este tío es propietario de la tierra que compró, pero legalmente no puede obligar a sus vecinos a venderle más tierras. ¿O no es así?
#9 Esto he encontrado en Reddit.
Clickbait title is clickbait.
The suits are more a discovery type item, not actually suing anybody in a punitive way.
In Hawaii, the natives are allowed to live on any land they hold, including access, regardless of who or what surrounds that land. People might have a piece of land on a farm, and that piece gets to have a safe right of way pathway road built to it if the Hawaiian person decides to have it. Or they can dispose of it to the person who otherwise surrounds their land. This is the law.
What Zuck is doing is attempting to root out the unused plots inside the land he owns so that he can buy them away. This requires filing... aka a 'suit'... to do so properly.
It's not like he's throwing people off their own land. It's more like "Hey... anyone using this? No? Ok, I claim domain. Oh, wait, you do? You using it? How much you want for it? Ok, cool, thanks, here's your money."
They are under NO obligation to sell. But they do have to be found and dealt with. And I'll be honest and admit that there will be some kind of gentle pressure to just sell it rather than keep it... 'gentle' being a nice way to put it.
Nonetheless, this article paints a negative light on what's going on, and if I were his lawyers, I would be having a couple of words with them about it... and how much it's going to cost them for doing it. But that's just me. He probably won't do anything about it, 'cause what's the point, after all. He's already pretty non-liked, seems, so what's another thing?
#11 Tal como lo describe parece que hablan de servidumbres de paso.
#11 entonces es una noticia sensacionalista
#9 Lo que ocurre es, según dicen al principio del vídeo, que dichos terrenos de Hawai son digamos cómo " herencias culturales". Herencias que se han transmitido durante generaciones entre los nativos.
Lo que pasa es que esa transmisión se hace oralmente y no hay registro escrito de ello.
#9 unas empresas empresas compran terrenos baratos a nativos
esas empresas lo venden a Zuckerberd por un pastizal.
Los nativos consideran la tierra suya por tradicion .
bla bla bla , video de buambulancia, mucho sensacionalismo.
El unico problema que veo es que si hay empresas que han comprado de forma fraudulenta los terrenos si habria que investigarlo, pero si los nativos "les pertenece" esa tierra por tradicion deberian regularizarlo.
¿Ahora porque el hijo de un nativo construya una chavola en cualquier parte de la isla, ya le pertenece ese terreno?
#23 ¿Y le debe pertenecer porque un gilipollas blanco lo ha comprado con dinero? Ellos estaban antes.
#24 ¿Y le debe pertenecer porque un asqueroso moreno dice que es suyo? ¿Como lo sabes? ¿tu estabas ahí?
#27 u
Un asqueroso moreno??? Ten un poco de dignidad y decencia y retira ese comentario racista. Te debería de dar puta vergüenza llamarlos así.
El término adecuado es payoponys.
Iv reich
Es el mismo que luego va pidiendo fronteras abiertas y welcome refugees. Vaya hipócrita
Los trabajadores de la CIA con dinero, pueden hacer lo que les de la gana.
Por algo en su empresa lo llaman el "pequeño dictador" y vosotros (ahora hablo a los que usáis facebook) seguir regalando a este personaje vuestra información para que el trafique con ella y se siga enriqueciendo.
#12 y no te olvides de los que usan whatsapp