Menéame: comentarios [1220162]

#6 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 08:09:33 +0000

ICRP reiterated the need to allow human exposure in order to "enjoy the economic and social benefits" of the nuclear industries despite the fact that so much new research was available documenting human illness associated with the "permissible" exposure levels.

www.zamboangatoday.ph/index.php/opinion/viewsopinions/3830-nuclear-rad

» autor: alehopio

#5 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:30:47 +0000

Radiation Experts: Radiation Standards Are Up to 1,000 Higher Than Is Safe for the Human Body

www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/radiation-experts-radiation-standards.

The U.S. federal drinking water standard for radioactive Iodine-131 is 3 picocuries per liter, but levels exceeding that by as much as 181 times have been detected in rainwater sampled in California, Idaho, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts.

Radioactivity has also been found in milk from Spokane, Washington.

» autor: alehopio

#4 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:22:16 +0000

Un resumen de muchas de estas mentiras del lobby nuclear puede leerse en

'No Safe Levels' of Radiation in Japan
ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=55118

» autor: alehopio

#3 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:15:58 +0000

Algunos ya venían apuntando el engaño de los supuestos expertos que no lo eran en esta materia en concreto, los efectos en la salud de las bajas dosis :

Deconstrucción de supuestos expertos nucleares en los medios ¿Nos están engañando sobre Fukushima?
www.meneame.net/story/deconstruccion-supuestos-expertos-nucleares-medi

» autor: alehopio

#2 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:50:17 +0000

Del modelo ECRR 2010
www.euradcom.org/2011/ecrr2010.pdf

(página 75)

The Committee’s response to this issue is to establish a risk factor for loss of quality of life of 0.1% per mSv ECRR exposure pertaining to a general reduction in general health excluding cancer. For loss of quality of life an exposure to internal fission products conventionally assessed at 0.8mSv by ICRP calculations may translate approximately to 200mSv ECRR and convey a 20% loss of quality of life; this will involve 20% increased risk from all illnesses with a genetic or somatic genetic component in the lifetime of those exposed. In this 2010 report the Committee also includes a specific risk factor for heart disease of 0.05 per Sv. This is based on the increased risk of heart disease in exposed individuals from radiotherapists, from those exposed to weapons test fallout and those exposed after Chernobyl.

» autor: alehopio

#1 El uso de un modelo desfasado para minimizar las secuencias de la contaminación nuclear [eng]

alehopio — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:14:25 +0000

#0 Párrafo demoledor:

<< The recently resigned Scientific Secretary of the ICRP, Dr Jack Valentin concedes to Dr. Chris Busby, that the ICRP model can not be used to predict the health effects of exposures and that for certain internal exposures it is underestimates the risk by up to two orders of magnitude (100 times). He also said that as he was no longer employed by ICRP he could agree that the ICRP and the United Nations committee on radiation protection (UNSCEAR) had been wrong in not examining the evidence from the Chernobyl accident, and other evidence outlined below, which shows large errors in the ICRP risk model. >>

» autor: alehopio