Si alguien quiere leer lo mismo pero sin el tono de hecatombe de LibreMercado: https://www.elindependiente.com/economia/2023/03/26/las-rentas-superiores-a-70-000-euros-asumiran-el-mayor-golpe-de-la-reforma-de-las-pensiones/
Portada
mis comunidades
otras secciones
#2 y de hecho, dice justo lo contrario a lo que afirma #1:
"The challenges we now face in the Netherlands are not an indictment of our liberal drug policy. Rather the opposite. Take the Dutch government’s approach to MDMA, influenced by the global war on drugs, which has become increasingly repressive since the late 1980s and early 90s. Under international pressure, the Netherlands placed MDMA, which is known as a party drug and perceived as relatively harmless, under the Opium Act in 1988, classifying it as a hard drug. This shift inadvertently contributed to the profitability of illegal MDMA production and created a lucrative business model for criminal organisations, as evidenced by the estimated €18.9bn street value of annual ecstasy production in the Netherlands. This experience reveals how efforts to align with global drug prohibition trends can have counterproductive outcomes. What the Netherlands’ problems reveal is the need for a global shift in the current approach. It’s not a matter of retracting our user-centred policy, but rather advocating for international recognition that the war on drugs is counterproductive."
Sumado a eso, se añade el problema por ser un centro financiero global yla facilidad para acceder a paraisos fiscales, no por su "legalicación": "Amsterdam, as an international financial hub, now serves as a marketplace where the demand for drugs is being determined, and negotiations and payments are being made from all over the world. It has become a destination for drug lords to launder their money or channel it to tax havens."