<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:meneame="http://meneame.net/faq-es.php"
 >
<channel>
	<title>ciencia: búsqueda en comentarios: #slatepitches</title>
	<link>http://www.meneame.net</link>
	
	<description>Sitio colaborativo de publicación y comunicación entre blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://blog.meneame.net/</generator>
	<language>es</language>
	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>35418943</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>3650634</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>1</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>blodhemn</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>1</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>30</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/juicio-theranos-demuestra-debemos-ser-escepticos-fusion-nuclear</meneame:url>
		<title>#1 El juicio a Theranos demuestra que debemos ser escépticos con la fusión nuclear [EN]</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/juicio-theranos-demuestra-debemos-ser-escepticos-fusion-nuclear/c01#c-1</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blodhemn</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/juicio-theranos-demuestra-debemos-ser-escepticos-fusion-nuclear/c01#c-1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Slate me parece una fuente sensacionalista (primero propiedad de Microsoft, luego de Jeff Bezzos el de Amazon (The Washington Post) y ahora de otros).<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)" title="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)</a><br />
&#34;Since 2006,[8] Slate has been known for publishing contrarian pieces arguing against commonly held views about a subject, giving rise to the <a href="/m/ciencia/search?w=comments&#38;q=%23slatepitches&#38;o=date">#slatepitches</a> Twitter hashtag in 2009.[9] The Columbia Journalism Review has defined Slate pitches as &#34;an idea that sounds wrong or counterintuitive proposed as though it were the tightest logic ever,&#34; and in explaining its success wrote &#34;Readers want to click on Slate Pitches because they want to know what a writer could possibly say that would support their logic&#34;.</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>blodhemn</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>35418386</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>3650460</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>20</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>blodhemn</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>3</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>51</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/inventan-nueva-fusion-nuclear-mucho-mas-barata-simple</meneame:url>
		<title>#20 Inventan una nueva fusión nuclear mucho más barata y simple</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/inventan-nueva-fusion-nuclear-mucho-mas-barata-simple/c020#c-20</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 11:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blodhemn</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/m/ciencia/inventan-nueva-fusion-nuclear-mucho-mas-barata-simple/c020#c-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>A mí la que me parece una fuente sensacionalista es Slate</b> (primero propiedad <b>de Microsoft</b>, luego <b>de Jeff Bezzos</b> el de Amazon (The Washington Post) <b>y ahora de otros</b>)<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)" title="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_(magazine)</a><br />
&#34;Since 2006,[8] Slate has been known for publishing contrarian pieces arguing against commonly held views about a subject, giving rise to the <a href="/m/ciencia/search?w=comments&#38;q=%23slatepitches&#38;o=date">#slatepitches</a> Twitter hashtag in 2009.[9] The Columbia Journalism Review has defined Slate pitches as &#34;an idea that sounds wrong or counterintuitive proposed as though it were the tightest logic ever,&#34; and in explaining its success wrote &#34;Readers want to click on Slate Pitches because they want to know what a writer could possibly say that would support their logic&#34;.</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>blodhemn</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
