El muro fronterizo con en el que hizo campaña el presidente Trump y que prometió que México pagaría, no ha progresado nada, en realidad es una mierda total que no tiene ninguna base en la realidad según un nuevo estudio de la "Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental". https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/693488.pdf
#2 Entro, leo lo que pones, pienso que yo ya lo dije cuando empezó la campaña Trump, y me doy cuenta que debería haber montado una empresa de estudios, ...
"Aparentemente, Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza no investigó algunos detalles menores al proponer costos para el muro, como lo que es el terreno, qué partes de la frontera deben bloquearse para evitar que los migrantes crucen y quién es el dueño del terreno. sería construido en. No parece gran cosa, ¿verdad?... Bueno, según el nuevo informe, estos descuidos podrían ser un gran problema.
Pero Trump no se mueve por estudios científicos sino por pensamiento mágico. Por eso no cree en el cambio climático y tal vez tampoco creerá en este estudio (depende de lo que le diga la guija, porque la ciencia no es confiable).
Mmmm no me lo he leido entero, pero parece que son los problemas derivados de "la ampliacion" en base a los planos originales:
The Secure Fence Act of 2006 amended IIRIRA to require DHS to
construct at least two layers of reinforced fencing, as well as roads,
lighting, cameras, and sensors, on certain segments of the southwest
border in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.13 The Secure
Fence Act of 2006 also required that DHS achieve and maintain
operational control over U.S. borders through surveillance activities and
physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful entry by foreign
nationals and facilitate CBP’s access to the borders.14 Subsequently, the
DHS Appropriations Act, 2008, rewrote IIRIRA’s border fencing section
and replaced it with requirements for DHS to construct at least 700 miles
of reinforced fencing where it would be most practical and effective; and
to install additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors to gain operational control of the southwest border.
Under IIRIRA, as amended, installation of tactical infrastructure or technology in
a particular location along the border is not required if the Secretary of
Homeland Security determines that use or placement of such resources
is not the most appropriate means to achieve and maintain operational
control over the border at that location. To address these requirements, from fiscal year 2005 through fiscal year 2015, CBP increased the total miles of primary barriers on the southwest border from 119 miles to 654 miles—including 354 miles of primary pedestrian barriers and 300 miles of primary vehicle barriers.17 CBP used various designs to construct the existing 654 miles of primary fencing.
See figure 1 for examples of fencing designs currently deployed along the
southwest border. According to Border Patrol officials, DHS focused its
deployment of pedestrian barriers near urban areas to divert illegal
entrants away from densely populated areas, where it is easier for them
to quickly blend into the surrounding community. Vehicle fencing, which is
meant to slow and prevent vehicles from crossing the border, is typically
deployed in more rural environments where, according to Border Patrol
officials, criminal organizations engaged in trafficking and smuggling use
vehicles to avoid encountering Border Patrol agents.
As CBP gained more information from test results, its plans for
developing new barrier designs evolved. In December 2017, CBP officials
stated that they did not plan to select any single prototype design for building new barrier segments. Rather, CBP officials stated they planned
to identify characteristics that improved or weakened the performance of
the prototypes, and use that information to create new design standards,
which could include concrete or other materials. In January 2018, after
viewing preliminary prototype test results, CBP officials told us they
planned to select design attributes that Border Patrol could use to
customize the barrier for each planned segment
En fin, no me lo he leído entero pero no parece que diga lo mismo que el titular.
Comentarios
Y han necesitado hacer un estudio...
#2 estudio pagado por México
#2 Entro, leo lo que pones, pienso que yo ya lo dije cuando empezó la campaña Trump, y me doy cuenta que debería haber montado una empresa de estudios, ...
"Aparentemente, Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza no investigó algunos detalles menores al proponer costos para el muro, como lo que es el terreno, qué partes de la frontera deben bloquearse para evitar que los migrantes crucen y quién es el dueño del terreno. sería construido en. No parece gran cosa, ¿verdad?... Bueno, según el nuevo informe, estos descuidos podrían ser un gran problema.
Enlace al estudio (PDF): https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/693488.pdf
Alguien tenía que decirlo.
Noto muchisima parcialidad en torno a ese informe, seguro que no le preguntaron al colectivo de los fabricantes de ladrillos
La Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental es una generadora de Fake News.
Pero Trump no se mueve por estudios científicos sino por pensamiento mágico. Por eso no cree en el cambio climático y tal vez tampoco creerá en este estudio (depende de lo que le diga la guija, porque la ciencia no es confiable).
¿Alguien esperaba algo mejor del mierda de tio ese?
Ejem.. bullshit traducido como mierda total? no me parece la traduccion mas correcta.
algo como "Idiotez absoluta" o "total tonteria" es mas parecido.
Mmmm no me lo he leido entero, pero parece que son los problemas derivados de "la ampliacion" en base a los planos originales:
The Secure Fence Act of 2006 amended IIRIRA to require DHS to
construct at least two layers of reinforced fencing, as well as roads,
lighting, cameras, and sensors, on certain segments of the southwest
border in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.13 The Secure
Fence Act of 2006 also required that DHS achieve and maintain
operational control over U.S. borders through surveillance activities and
physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful entry by foreign
nationals and facilitate CBP’s access to the borders.14 Subsequently, the
DHS Appropriations Act, 2008, rewrote IIRIRA’s border fencing section
and replaced it with requirements for DHS to construct at least 700 miles
of reinforced fencing where it would be most practical and effective; and
to install additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors to gain operational control of the southwest border.
Under IIRIRA, as amended, installation of tactical infrastructure or technology in
a particular location along the border is not required if the Secretary of
Homeland Security determines that use or placement of such resources
is not the most appropriate means to achieve and maintain operational
control over the border at that location. To address these requirements, from fiscal year 2005 through fiscal year 2015, CBP increased the total miles of primary barriers on the southwest border from 119 miles to 654 miles—including 354 miles of primary pedestrian barriers and 300 miles of primary vehicle barriers.17 CBP used various designs to construct the existing 654 miles of primary fencing.
See figure 1 for examples of fencing designs currently deployed along the
southwest border. According to Border Patrol officials, DHS focused its
deployment of pedestrian barriers near urban areas to divert illegal
entrants away from densely populated areas, where it is easier for them
to quickly blend into the surrounding community. Vehicle fencing, which is
meant to slow and prevent vehicles from crossing the border, is typically
deployed in more rural environments where, according to Border Patrol
officials, criminal organizations engaged in trafficking and smuggling use
vehicles to avoid encountering Border Patrol agents.
As CBP gained more information from test results, its plans for
developing new barrier designs evolved. In December 2017, CBP officials
stated that they did not plan to select any single prototype design for building new barrier segments. Rather, CBP officials stated they planned
to identify characteristics that improved or weakened the performance of
the prototypes, and use that information to create new design standards,
which could include concrete or other materials. In January 2018, after
viewing preliminary prototype test results, CBP officials told us they
planned to select design attributes that Border Patrol could use to
customize the barrier for each planned segment
En fin, no me lo he leído entero pero no parece que diga lo mismo que el titular.