<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:meneame="http://meneame.net/faq-es.php"
 >
<channel>
	<title>Menéame: comentarios [52041]</title>
	<link>http://www.meneame.net</link>
	
	<description>Sitio colaborativo de publicación y comunicación entre blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://blog.meneame.net/</generator>
	<language>es</language>
	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214634</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>7</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>merinet</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>0</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>5</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#7 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c07#c-7</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>merinet</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c07#c-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Es contra la SGAE, meneo al canto.</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>merinet</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214437</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>6</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>fitamix</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>1</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>13</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#6 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c06#c-6</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fitamix</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c06#c-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lo que no puedo llegar a entender como es la SGAE la que tiene que velar por los derechos de autor y no la propia administración. Y más aún, como puede ser la propia SGAE la que haga con lo que recauda lo que quiera, con el dinero recaudado por este impuesto (injusto a mi forma de ver, pues pagan justos por pecadores).</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>fitamix</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214393</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>5</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>ecocat</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>0</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>6</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#5 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c05#c-5</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecocat</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c05#c-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>menudo morro tienen estos de la SGAE !!<br />
<br />
van diciendo por ahí lo que tiene que hacer la justicia, A CO JO NAN TE !!</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>ecocat</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214354</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>4</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>--6325--</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>3</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>-37</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#4 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c04#c-4</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>--6325--</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c04#c-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[Usuario deshabilitado]</p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>--6325--</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214117</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>3</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>--8349--</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>1</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>36</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#3 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c03#c-3</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>--8349--</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c03#c-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>bueno, es que la que señala <a class="tooltip c:52041-1" href="https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c01#c-1" rel="nofollow">#1</a> era repetida de <a href="http://meneame.net/story/llueve-sobre-mojado-otra-sentencia-contra-sgae" title="meneame.net/story/llueve-sobre-mojado-otra-sentencia-contra-sgae" rel="nofollow">meneame.net/story/llueve-sobre-mojado-otra-sentencia-contra-sgae</a></p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>--8349--</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214110</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>2</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>manwy</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>4</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>-26</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#2 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c02#c-2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>manwy</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c02#c-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Está claro que es duplicada. Lo que no entiendo es porqué la que dice <a class="tooltip c:52041-1" href="https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c01#c-1" rel="nofollow">#1</a> está descartada. Ahora viene el dilema... ¿se vota la anterior para intentar que deje de estar descartada y se vota duplicada esta? ¿se vota esta para que la gente se entere ya que se considera interesante pese a ser duplicada? No sé.... ¿patada en los cojones? <img data-src="https://cdn.mnmstatic.net/v_149/img/menemojis/36/tongue.png" alt=":-P" title=":-P" width="18" height="18" src="https://cdn.mnmstatic.net/v_149/img/g.gif" class="emoji lazy" /></p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>manwy</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>214034</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>52041</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>1</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>--2294--</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>0</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>19</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios</meneame:url>
		<title>#1 La SGAE no es imprescindible en los juicios</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c01#c-1</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>--2294--</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/sgae-no-imprescindible-juicios/c01#c-1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>¿dupe/relacionada? aunque la otra está en el hoyo <a href="http://meneame.net/story/rechazado-recurso-sgae-contra-sentencia-canon-judicial" title="meneame.net/story/rechazado-recurso-sgae-contra-sentencia-canon-judicial" rel="nofollow">meneame.net/story/rechazado-recurso-sgae-contra-sentencia-canon-judici</a></p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>--2294--</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
