<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:meneame="http://meneame.net/faq-es.php"
 >
<channel>
	<title>Menéame: comentarios [4831]</title>
	<link>http://www.meneame.net</link>
	
	<description>Sitio colaborativo de publicación y comunicación entre blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://blog.meneame.net/</generator>
	<language>es</language>
	<item>
		<meneame:comment_id>7551</meneame:comment_id>
		<meneame:link_id>4831</meneame:link_id>
		<meneame:order>1</meneame:order>
		<meneame:user>jopemoro</meneame:user>
		<meneame:votes>0</meneame:votes>
		<meneame:karma>6</meneame:karma>
		<meneame:url>https://www.meneame.net/story/la-patente-sobre-jpeg-a-revision</meneame:url>
		<title>#1 La patente sobre JPEG, a revisión</title>
		<link>https://www.meneame.net/story/la-patente-sobre-jpeg-a-revision/c01#c-1</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jopemoro</dc:creator>
		<guid>https://www.meneame.net/story/la-patente-sobre-jpeg-a-revision/c01#c-1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>También hay información aquí: <a href="http://news.com.com/Patent+office+to+re-examine+JPEG+patent/2100-1014_3-6034544.html?tag=nefd.top" title="news.com.com/Patent+office+to+re-examine+JPEG+patent/2100-1014_3-6034544.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow">news.com.com/Patent+office+to+re-examine+JPEG+patent/2100-1014_3-60345</a></p><p>&#187;&nbsp;autor: <strong>jopemoro</strong></p>]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
