#227#226 Curiosamente, justo antes de leer tu mensaje, mirando las definiciones de ateísmo y agnosticismo acababa de descubrir una cita de Dawkins que creo que puede servir de colofón, ya que si estamos de acuerdo en lo esencial y nuestra diferencia es de terminología, tampoco tiene mucho sentido seguir discutiendo (y como dices, esto ya no lo está leyendo nadie).
According to Richard Dawkins, a distinction between agnosticism and atheism is unwieldy and depends on how close to zero we are willing to rate the existence of any given god-like entity. Since in practice it is not worth contrasting a zero probability with a probability that is nearly indistinguishable from zero, he prefers to categorize himself as a "de facto atheist". He specifies his position by means of a scale of 1 to 7. On this scale, 1 indicates "100 per cent probability of God." A person ranking at 7 on the scale would be a person who says "I know there is no God..." Dawkins places himself at 6 on the scale, saying "I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
Según esto, si aceptamos esta definición, tanto tú como yo somos "ateos de facto"
