#26#23 por si a alguien le interesa, en la página 27 de la edición en inglés de Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science de Alan Sokal y Jean Bricmont, citan a Lacan:
Thus, the erectile organ comes to simbolize the place of jouissance, not in itself, or even in the form of an image, but as a part lacking in the desired image: That is why it is equivalent to the /-1 (no sé poner el símbolo de raíz quadrada) of the signification produced above, of the jouissance that it restores by the coefficient of its statement to the function of lack of signifier (-1).
Thus, the erectile organ comes to simbolize the place of jouissance, not in itself, or even in the form of an image, but as a part lacking in the desired image: That is why it is equivalent to the /-1 (no sé poner el símbolo de raíz quadrada) of the signification produced above, of the jouissance that it restores by the coefficient of its statement to the function of lack of signifier (-1).